RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02849
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the following
awards and decorations:
1. Air Medal (AM) with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (2/BOLCs).
2. Other AMs awarded to him.
3. Aircrew Wing and Combat Crew Badge.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was awarded the AM with 2/BOLCs while assigned to the
6988th Security Squadron.
He was also awarded other AM clusters but did not receive them
prior to his release from active duty.
He wore aircrew member wings and the combat crew badge but they
are not reflected on his DD Form 214.
The medals and badges were awarded to him and should appear on
his DD Form 214.
In support of his requests, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 214, award certificate, citation and special orders.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 28 Dec 1964, the applicant entered active duty.
The applicants records show he was assigned to the
6988th Security Squadron, Yokota Air Base, Japan, from Jun
1966 to Nov 1967.
On 11 Oct 1968, he was honorably discharged.
He served three years, ten months and three days on active duty.
The AM may be awarded to any person who while serving in any
capacity with the United States Armed Forces, subsequent to
8 Sep 1939, distinguishes himself or herself by meritorious
achievement while participating in aerial flight. Additionally,
it may be conferred for sustained meritorious achievement
(distinction) in the performance of duties involving aerial
flight.
The Aircrew Badge, commonly known as Wings, is a qualification
badge of the United States military that is awarded by all
branches of the armed services to personnel who serve as crew
members on military aircrafts. The badge is intended to
recognize the training and qualifications required by aircrew of
military aircraft. In order to qualify as an aircrew member and
receive the Aircrew Badge, such personnel typically undergo
advanced training in aircraft in-flight support roles.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends approval for award of the AM with 2/BOLCs
as the signed certificate and citation appear to be authentic.
Should the Board grant the applicants request for the AM with
2/BOLCs, DPSID will update the award on the applicants DD Form
214.
DPSID recommends disapproval for award of any additional AMs.
Insufficient evidence has been provided to support that an
injustice occurred. There is no official documentation in the
applicants record to verify he was recommended for or awarded
any additional AMs. The applicant has not provided proposed
citations, a recommendation from someone with firsthand
knowledge, or any eye witness statements to help support his
claim. Furthermore, over 45 years have passed since the
applicant contends the awards should have been made. To grant
relief would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established
by the Department of Defense (DOD) Manual 1348.33, Manual of
Military Decorations and Awards.
A review of the applicants master personnel records show he is
entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and
one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1BOLC), Vietnam Service
Medal with one Bronze Service Star (VSM w/1BSS) and the Republic
of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P). Upon the
Boards final determination, DPSID will administratively correct
the applicants records to reflect these awards.
The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the applicants request for
the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings). The supporting
documents provided by the applicant substantiate he was an
aircrew member and met the requirements for the permanent award
of the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings).
The complete A3O-AIF evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 29 Oct 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Notwithstanding the above, insufficient relevant evidence
has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or
injustice for award of any additional AMs beyond the
aforementioned. In this respect, we agree with the Air Force
Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been
the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we do not recommend approving this
portion of the applicants request.
4. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant
partial relief. After a thorough review of the applicants
submission and his service records, we agree with the opinions
and recommendations of the Air Force OPRs that the supporting
documents provided by the applicant substantiate award of the AM
with 2/BOLCs and the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings).
Although the applicant requests award of the aircrew wings and
the combat crew badge, the correct award to denote qualification
as an aircrew member is the Aircrew Member Badge. We also note
that DPSID has verified the applicants entitlement to the AFOUA
w/V & 1BOLC, VSM w/1BSS and the RVNGC w/P and his DD Form 214
will be administratively corrected to reflect these awards.
Accordingly, we recommend the applicants records be corrected
to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records relating to APPLICANT, be
corrected to show that his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in
conjunction with his 11 Oct 1968 separation, be amended in Item
24, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, to include the Air Medal
with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters and the Basic Aircrew Member
Badge.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-02849 in Executive Session on 15 Apr 2014, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documents were considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 23 Aug 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, USAF/A3O-AIF, dated 3 Oct 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991
NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicants records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicants request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01190
On 12 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant that after a review of his records and the documents he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at DaNang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 12 Jan 67 to 13 May 67, for 4 months and 1 day. Such permanent award will be entered in the AF Form 7 of individuals so entitled. Based on the documentation provided by the applicant, he was designated as a crew member per AO-11, effective 23 Jun 65. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00612
Attained at least 150 hours of flying duty as an The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Aircrew Member and Flight Engineer Badges indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03394
Aeronautical orders are not related to travel orders and would have been required in addition to the travel orders. Members who are properly qualified and directed to perform specific inflight duties, not on a frequent and regular basis, may be ordered to do so using a flight authorization. AFR 60-13, paragraph 7-5 states Nonrated officers are authorized to wear the officer aircrew member badge while assigned to and performing aircrew duties in a designated MSL position identified by a G,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00092
Airmen crew members will be placed on indefinite flying status as long as they satisfactorily perform their duties, remain physically qualified, are assigned to an authorized Unit Manning Document (UMD) aircrew position (identified by the prefix "A") which requires duties as a crew member and participate in frequent and regular aerial flights. Lastly, he requests the Board review the uniqueness of the flying requirements of his AFSC in the T-29 Aircraft, and grant him the Air Force Crew...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05881
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05881 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Observer Wings In Accordance With (IAW) AFR 50-7, Aeronautical Ratings and Requirements for their Attainment, dated 13 Mar 53. In an application dated 30 Dec 12, the applicant requested an exception to policy to AFR 50-7 due to the fact that he was in a TDY status to an Air Force unit while...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01102
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, for the period of service 30 Sep 57 to 20 Aug 60, be corrected to add the following awards: 1. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicants request for the NDSM, indicating there is no...