Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02849
Original file (BC 2013 02849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02849
			COUNSEL:  NONE
	  		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the following 
awards and decorations:

1.  Air Medal (AM) with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (2/BOLCs). 

2.  Other AM’s awarded to him. 

3.  Aircrew Wing and Combat Crew Badge.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was awarded the AM with 2/BOLCs while assigned to the      
6988th Security Squadron.

He was also awarded other AM clusters but did not receive them 
prior to his release from active duty.

He wore aircrew member wings and the combat crew badge but they 
are not reflected on his DD Form 214.  

The medals and badges were awarded to him and should appear on 
his DD Form 214.

In support of his requests, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, award certificate, citation and special orders.  

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Dec 1964, the applicant entered active duty.

The applicant’s records show he was assigned to the          
6988th Security Squadron, Yokota Air Base, Japan, from Jun    
1966 to Nov 1967.  

On 11 Oct 1968, he was honorably discharged.

He served three years, ten months and three days on active duty. 

The AM may be awarded to any person who while serving in any 
capacity with the United States Armed Forces, subsequent to     
8 Sep 1939, distinguishes himself or herself by meritorious 
achievement while participating in aerial flight.  Additionally, 
it may be conferred for sustained meritorious achievement 
(distinction) in the performance of duties involving aerial 
flight.

The Aircrew Badge, commonly known as Wings, is a qualification 
badge of the United States military that is awarded by all 
branches of the armed services to personnel who serve as crew 
members on military aircrafts. The badge is intended to 
recognize the training and qualifications required by aircrew of 
military aircraft. In order to qualify as an aircrew member and 
receive the Aircrew Badge, such personnel typically undergo 
advanced training in aircraft in-flight support roles.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends approval for award of the AM with 2/BOLCs 
as the signed certificate and citation appear to be authentic.  
Should the Board grant the applicant’s request for the AM with 
2/BOLCs, DPSID will update the award on the applicant’s DD Form 
214.  

DPSID recommends disapproval for award of any additional AMs.   
Insufficient evidence has been provided to support that an 
injustice occurred.  There is no official documentation in the 
applicant’s record to verify he was recommended for or awarded 
any additional AMs.  The applicant has not provided proposed 
citations, a recommendation from someone with firsthand 
knowledge, or any eye witness statements to help support his 
claim.  Furthermore, over 45 years have passed since the 
applicant contends the awards should have been made.  To grant 
relief would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established 
by the Department of Defense (DOD) Manual 1348.33, Manual of 
Military Decorations and Awards. 

A review of the applicant’s master personnel records show he is 
entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and 
one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1BOLC), Vietnam Service 
Medal with one Bronze Service Star (VSM w/1BSS) and the Republic 
of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P).  Upon the 
Board’s final determination, DPSID will administratively correct 
the applicant’s records to reflect these awards. 

The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the applicant’s request for 
the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings).  The supporting 
documents provided by the applicant substantiate he was an 
aircrew member and met the requirements for the permanent award 
of the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings).  

The complete A3O-AIF evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 29 Oct 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within       
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit E).   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.  

3.  Notwithstanding the above, insufficient relevant evidence 
has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or 
injustice for award of any additional AM’s beyond the 
aforementioned.  In this respect, we agree with the Air Force 
Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been 
the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence 
of evidence to the contrary, we do not recommend approving this 
portion of the applicant’s request.  

4.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
partial relief.  After a thorough review of the applicant’s 
submission and his service records, we agree with the opinions 
and recommendations of the Air Force OPRs that the supporting 
documents provided by the applicant substantiate award of the AM 
with 2/BOLCs and the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings).  
Although the applicant requests award of the aircrew wings and 
the combat crew badge, the correct award to denote qualification 
as an aircrew member is the Aircrew Member Badge.  We also note 
that DPSID has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the AFOUA 
w/V & 1BOLC, VSM w/1BSS and the RVNGC w/P and his DD Form 214 
will be administratively corrected to reflect these awards.   
Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected 
to the extent indicated below. 
 
________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records relating to APPLICANT, be 
corrected to show that his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the 
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in 
conjunction with his 11 Oct 1968 separation, be amended in Item 
24, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and 
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, to include the Air Medal 
with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters and the Basic Aircrew Member 
Badge. 

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-02849 in Executive Session on 15 Apr 2014, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documents were considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 23 Aug 2013, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, USAF/A3O-AIF, dated 3 Oct 2013.  
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.




 
Panel Chair



 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893

    Original file (BC 2013 05893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163

    Original file (BC 2013 02163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01190

    Original file (BC 2014 01190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant that after a review of his records and the documents he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at DaNang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 12 Jan 67 to 13 May 67, for 4 months and 1 day. Such permanent award will be entered in the AF Form 7 of individuals so entitled.” Based on the documentation provided by the applicant, he was designated as a crew member per AO-11, effective 23 Jun 65. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00612

    Original file (BC-2012-00612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Attained at least 150 hours of flying duty as an The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Aircrew Member and Flight Engineer Badges indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03394

    Original file (BC-2013-03394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aeronautical orders are not related to travel orders and would have been required in addition to the travel orders. Members who are properly qualified and directed to perform specific inflight duties, not on a frequent and regular basis, may be ordered to do so using a flight authorization.” AFR 60-13, paragraph 7-5 states “Nonrated officers are authorized to wear the officer aircrew member badge while assigned to and performing aircrew duties in a designated MSL position identified by a G,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00092

    Original file (BC 2014 00092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Airmen crew members will be placed on indefinite flying status as long as they satisfactorily perform their duties, remain physically qualified, are assigned to an authorized Unit Manning Document (UMD) aircrew position (identified by the prefix "A") which requires duties as a crew member and participate in frequent and regular aerial flights. Lastly, he requests the Board review the uniqueness of the flying requirements of his AFSC in the T-29 Aircraft, and grant him the Air Force Crew...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05881

    Original file (BC 2013 05881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05881 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Observer Wings In Accordance With (IAW) AFR 50-7, Aeronautical Ratings and Requirements for their Attainment, dated 13 Mar 53. In an application dated 30 Dec 12, the applicant requested an exception to policy to AFR 50-7 due to the fact that he was in a TDY status to an Air Force unit while...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01102

    Original file (BC 2014 01102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, for the period of service 30 Sep 57 to 20 Aug 60, be corrected to add the following awards: 1. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the NDSM, indicating there is no...